Normally
when we think of discerning the signs, we move towards the societal structure,
and look at the economic and political context of our country to read the signs of the time and to
articulate the signs and create new theological formulations to make ourselves
relevant. But most of the time we fail to discern the signs of the time from the
view point of our churches from where we have come from and to where we are going
to serve.
Theological
institutions always would like to involve in an exercise to give new
theological orientation to the world by reading the signs of the time, but usually fail
to read the signs of the church. Are our churches ready to receive or
willing to grasp any of our theological formulations made by reading
the signs of the time? In the past, the churches and their leadership were willing
to look at things openly and willing to accept any new expressions to make the
church relevant in its mission. It was told that the paradigmatic expressions made by CISRS
and UTC were readily experimented by St.Mark's Cathedral. But today neither are
churches open, nor is the leadership fascinated in the new reading of signs or
the formulations of theological foundations for the church’s meaningful
existence! This is because the church in the process of its history has turned
into being more institutionalized and in the progression has lost its movement
character as Jesus has envisioned.
The
biblical narration in Mathew 9: 35ff, describes Jesus’ involvement in the
reading of the signs of his time by moving from one village to another and try
to build the reign of God with those who were harassed and helpless and being
lost in the community. In this process he calls his disciples to be involved
with those people who are at the margins because they are like sheep without a shepherd.
But today how many churches can claim that their church's priority is the
lost sheep in the community and there is importance to give them identity and to share the good news
that they are part of God's rule and reign?
Following this life giving call of
Jesus, the early disciples established a new community with three challenges. Firstly, the value of depending on the affirmation of
having the power of Jesus of Nazareth (Acts 3:6) instead of depending on gold and
silver to establish the rule of God. Secondly, in the context of Jesus’
crucifixion by the authorities, the believers made their life as living witnesses
for the presence of Jesus in their community. It is the walk the talk experience
of the community. (Acts 3:15). Thirdly, when the rulers and religious heads restricted
them not to involve in the Jesus movement and to keep away from sharing the good
news of Jesus, they boldly said Is it right in God's sight to listen to you
rather then to God....we cannot keep from speaking about what we have seen and
heard.(Acts 4:19-21) These three challenges of the early Jesus community
gives us an opportunity in a time like this in the life of our church to
discern whether we are part of that movement of Jesus? Are our theological
colleges helping us to hear the voice of God rather than the voices of the people
in authority. The challenging prophetic voice of the early disciples gives us
an opportunity to think afresh our vocation “To whom we serve?''
Vincent Rajkumar
Director, Christian Institute for the Study of Religion and Society (CISRS)
(Preached in the Tagore Hall of the UTC for UTC Sunday evening worship today.)
No comments:
Post a Comment