Invitation to the UTC Christmas Carol Service 2014

 

A worship in UTC to remember the Bhopal gas tragedy

Transforming Wisdom into Faith: the Challenge in Modern Mission (James 3:13-18)

When I observed United Nations Organization’s special days I saw today, 20^th Nov, is the “World Philosophy Day”. Being placed between two other important days “World Toilet day” (19^th Nov) and “World Television Day” (21^st Nov), it looks like placing wisdom as a transition point between our un-exposable state of life to the open expression of modernity and change in public. The given passage for today, James 3:13-18, also is a challenge to think about our transition in the modern day society from an un-exposable state of life to the expression of our Christian public witness, keeping wisdom as the transition point.

The direct and indirect use of the synoptic ideas about Jesus, the use of high standard Koine Greek that is better than the Johannine Greek and Letter to the Hebrews, use of the themes of the Sermon on the Mount, use of 59 imperatives, use of the Septuagint, finest knowledge about the twelve tribes of Israel, compassion towards the poor, widows and the orphan, condemning the lavish life, etc., makes the letter one of the best studied texts among the New Testament scholarship but at the same time a controversial one.

At the end of James chapter 3, in a chapter almost entirely dedicated to taming the tongue, we come across this small section, which appears to be thrown in by James as an afterthought on wisdom. James gives to wisdom the same prominence that Paul gives to faith, John gives to love, and Peter gives to hope.

James 3:13-18 can also be seen as a story of wisdom presented as two completely different sides of the same coin. On one side, we see a heavenly wisdom from above, which is full of mercy and peace. On the other, an earthly wisdom, which is characterized by jealousy, greed, pride, and selfish ambition. The present day context challenges us to be mindful about such duality present in ourselves and in the world. Thus I would like to title this reflection as Transforming Wisdom into Faith: Challenge in Modern Mission. Based on this, I would like to place three challenges in such a time, in the world and the cosmos to strive for mission in its pure form.

1. Challenge of wisdom to transform vocal conviction into gentle action.

The mental and moral qualities distinctive to an individual are expressed through their words, but understood by others through their actions. Here in 3:13, James negates the Pauline idea of “Justification by Faith” expressed in Romans 3:28 by his unique expression of “Justification by Work.” Doctors have to practice what they learned. Likewise, a lawyer or an engineer. But the only one field where people can survive without practicing what they have learned seems to be the theological circle. But a true Christian is the one who practices what he or she has learned and is saying. I think, James was aware that none of us will keep our mouth shut. Once our mouth is shut, we are jobless. Because, preaching is our primary job. But James wants all of us to use wisdom when we open our mouths. That will ultimately lead us into transforming our vocal conviction into gentle action.

2. Challenge of wisdom to transform weaknesses into talents.

Think positive and positive things will happen in your life and through you to the others. Through rationalizing, our weaknesses will be exposed to ourselves, but through faith all those weaknesses can be transformed into talents. When I was a child, I had a stammering tongue. To say a word, for example, if I want to say the word Jesus, I had to try more than five times. But my teachers gave me a strange advice. They instructed me to put small stones in my mouth and asked me to speak out. I think I practiced vigorously for about two years. Now I think I can speak better. James emphasizes that wisdom is living a Christ-like life in ordinary human circumstances. A change of attitude or character lays in our own choice and so also our talents. For James, being wise is seen in our willingness to acknowledge the will of God in our own life, and our readiness to change our weaknesses into talents.

3. Challenge of wisdom to transform ego into humanness.

Being foolish is not a crime, but more than that. Wisdom comes from only one source, that is God. But when it comes to making a fool of yourself, you have your choice of thousands of different ways. James through this passage challenges to learn that, before you do anything. James expects total commitment, expressed by subordination initially not subsequently. We spend much of our life time in search of knowledge. In that process, sometimes it is possible that we may be influenced by the wrong knowledge or foolishness in many ways.

We know the equation of life that “no one can serve two masters”. Likewise, no one at the same time can bear ego and humanness. How many of us are thinking that we are wise? One of the supreme examples for this is recorded in Matthew 2:1-12 and its result in 2:16-18. There, we read about the “wise men from the east.” In Matthew 2:16-18 we read about the wisdom of those so-called wise men having resulted in the slaughtering of all the innocent boys below the age of two, in and around Bethlehem. That wisdom cannot be called as wisdom but for me they are called the wisest but are egoistic fools.

Now in this 21^st century, we are also witnessing the slaughtering of innocent children in Syria and in Iraq. All the forms of unrest in and outside our campus and in the society, persecutions in the world arena are an outcome of wisdom in its un-upgraded form. No faith community in its pure form is life threatening, but life affirming. We are one such. Are we a life affirming or life threatening community? The real challenge that all the faith communities should seriously engage in the present day context is to upgrade our wisdom. For me, when we upgrade wisdom, we will get faith. Through upgrading our wisdom into faith we are providing goodness today and hope for tomorrow, no matter the circumstances.

Friends, we are called to express a clear faith in this unclear world now and here. We are called to present everlasting, divine principles that are relevant to the context. For that cause are we using our wisdom or faith? What are we learning for: to become wise or to grow in faith to help others to grow in faith? Why are we here, to learn wisdom or to upgrade our faiths? If a professor is grading low, we ask why did you grade me low. But if anybody asks you about the standard of your faith before and after theological training, what will be your answer? Let us create a habit of respecting all who help us to grow in faith, especially our teachers.

UTC is a permanent mission field for none of us. But our permanent mission field is the society. Are we really preparing for that? No doubt that wisdom can take you to some extent, but faith can take you and through you others even further up to the life eternal. We all will upgrade our mobile phones, but what about our faith? Let us pray to the triune God to help us to transform our wisdom into faith. Amen.

Vinod S. Sailus

MTh II

Fundamental Human Kindness (Deuteronomy 10:12-19)

We heard from the scripture from Deuteronomy, what God had done for the Israelites and how Moses now called to respond and make a commitment to God. "The structure of the passage reveals an enveloping pattern in which we encounter commands to obey God (vv. 12-13), embrace the outcome of command to show proper care and concern for people, especially the socially and economically disadvantaged later in vv. 14-19. The motive part of this whole pericope and that which binds the whole together is v. 17, a confession of the sovereignty of God and of God’s justice." In view of God’s past grace to God’s people, what did God require of them? Moses summarized Israel's responsibility: fear, walk, love, serve, and keep. God expected total commitment, faithfulness and obedience to God’s covenant. "These are the central ideas not only of Deuteronomy but of the whole Pentateuch in its final shape." 

 

Let us look to God in prayer: When you preached on earth, Lord, you found the divine words that were able to reach the hearts of your hearers. Your truth moved them deeply and encouraged them to follow you and to live for you. Lord, bless now the words that I speak and the meditation of all our hearts be acceptable in your sight, our rock and redeemer. Amen.

A priest was sent behind bars just because he was propagating the word of God. This is an incident which happened in Kashmir, when he was debarred from the land of Kashmir with an allegation that “he was converting people forcefully”. In the text Moses asks, "So now, O Israel, what does the LORD your God require of you...?" What does God require from us today as we reflect on this passage? That priest was fulfilling God’s requirements but still he suffered and injustice enthralled his life. He boldly said, “It is my responsibility to preach God’s Word. I can’t refuse anyone. The house of God is open for all.” Now we have to keep in mind that this text addresses people who already know God; those who already have a personal relationship with God. So this is speaking of requirements for living a Christian life, not entering it.

Deuteronomy serves as Moses’ farewell speech to the nation of Israel as the nation prepares to embark on entering the Promised Land. It was written to instruct the covenant people of Israel how to live in relationship with God. The opening words of v12 are among the most familiar in the Hebrew Bible, partly because of their use in Micah 6:8 “'what does YHWH require of you?', that gives the answer in Deuteronomy .i.e. to do justice, and to love kindness, and to walk humbly with your God?”

This question represents one of the two basic ideas about our faith and religion. How can a human approach God? One answer is: with sacrifice which people used to do at early times, things and by doing good works which are pleasing to God. The other answer is also reflected in v8. God requires not some external gifts from a worshipper, but a humble communicant who loves to serve God and practices justice towards their fellow humans. Now the question is how justice can be prevailed? Our so called sophisticated society, cannot breathe until we accomplish our mean and selfish desires by dumping or by hurting each other. The priest, about whom we have just talked, still continues to give his testimony as what God requires from him he will do and serve till his last breath.

The news readings which have been read before us explain the scenario of happenings in our societies, about the injustices that are prevailing. How justice can prevail over the nations, how we can do justice to our neighbors and others, that is still a big question even as we are witnessing in such a time as this. Where girls can’t walk freely, where caste issues still prevail, where people are dying of hunger, where dalits are made voiceless, we still keep quiet and thus we, the theological community, who make several liberal theologies showing great interest in pain and agony, we do talk but silently, we do react but don’t act, we do show solidarity but hardly we are recognized with them.

Jesus told the story about the Good Samaritan. A man was robbed and left for dead on the side of the road. Three people passed safely on the other side of the road- a Jewish priest, a Jewish rabbi, a third dirty and messy religious. It was only the Samaritan who stopped, knelt down and offered to help in kindness, mercy, and gentleness. The ingredient that God requires from His disciples is fundamental human kindness…to family, friends, work associates, classmates, and strangers.

How Moses now expounds the ‘requirements’ about fear of God can make a difference in our lives. When we hear the word “fear” that itself creates a misunderstanding between the relationship of human and God, which can be taken as the fear of God is to fear the judgment of God and eternal death, which is eternal separation from God. But here the fear of God is something much different. The fear is reverence of God.

Proverbs 1:7 declares, “The fear of the LORD is the beginning of knowledge…” Until we understand who God is, and develop a reverential fear of Him, we cannot have true wisdom. True wisdom comes only from understanding who God is, this is where we misunderstood God who is holy, just, and righteous. Deuteronomy 10:12, records, "Now, Israel, what does the LORD your God require from you, but to fear the LORD your God, to walk in all His ways and love Him, and to serve the LORD your God with all your heart and with all your soul, You shall fear the LORD your God; you shall serve Him and cling to Him, and you shall swear by His name. He is your praise and He is your God, who has done these great and awesome things for you which your eyes have seen." The fear of God is the basis for our walking in His ways, serving Him, and yes, loving Him.
What does the Lord require of you? Do justice. Love kindness. And walk humbly with your God.

Amen

Amos Massey

MTh I

Called to walk the path of Jesus Christ (Mat 5:11-12)

When I was 13 years old, I met a preacher from Romania. He was unable to stand. So he used to sit while preaching. The reason behind that is, at the age of 40 he was imprisoned for proclaiming the gospel in a communist country. During his 8 and 1/2 years of imprisonment he suffered a lot. The soldiers beat him brutally and asked him to deny Jesus Christ. They also tortured him by making him hear “Communist is the best and Christianity is the worst”. In that situation also he was strong in faith and proclaimed the Gospel to the soldiers. As a result, they understood that he will not deny Christ, so they added again 25years of imprisonment.  After his release he preached all over the world. The man tortured for Christ is none other than Richard Wurmbrand.

For Such A Time As This: Discerning Christian Public Witness

John Chrysostom described the beatitudes, "as a kind of golden chain." Like the Ten Commandments, each stands alone. Mat 5:11-12 is the concluding part of the beatitudes. The first four beatitudes describe the heart of the person who is rightly related to God. The remaining beatitudes describe how such a person relates to other people. Each of the beatitudes consists of two phrases: the condition and the result. This beatitude is in present tense, just like the first beatitude. Here Jesus speaks in the second person “You” and directly addresses the person before him. This saying is peculiar to Christianity. Jesus encourages his disciples to see their current suffering as an honourable tradition. I would like to explain it under two aspects.

1. Faithfulness towards Happiness

In Greek, the word 'persecute' comes from the root 'to pursue', it means to chase after something. A good translation of this word is to 'harass'. In the centuries before Jesus, the Jewish prophets followed the way of righteousness and were frequently persecuted for their faithfulness. For example: Elijah was driven into exile; Jeremiah was imprisoned in a cistern; Zechariah was stoned to death in the court of the Lord. Shortly before Jesus delivered these words, the disciples of John the Baptist suffered and he was murdered. Jesus’ disciples also underwent similar suffering. In the history of the church of martyrdom, both men and women have undergone ultimate sacrifices for God. However, such persecution is by no means a thing of the past but it happens even today in our faith journey. As a Christian community, whatever hurdles or struggles come on our way let us try to stand firm in our faith. Faithful Christians are faithful in their trials. Faithful Christians are faithful in their testimony. Faithful Christians are faithful with their treasure & talents. Let us be a witness not just as human beings on this planet, but as cloud of witnesses that have gone before us that remain here upon the earth, as faithful children of God.

2. Walk Worthy towards Reward

“Reward” is more a promise of “future recompense for a present condition of persecution and reproach” than a reward for goodness. There is no comparison here with a lesser reward and a greater reward. If the idea of a reward sounds strange, one should realize that it is a reward of God’s grace. And it is not merited, but it is God’s will to give to those who serve God faithfully. The disciples are urged to "walk worthily of the vocation wherewith they are called." So the reward should be thought of as heaven, and not for some particular status in the life to come. “Walk” is frequently used in the New Testament to refer to daily conduct. “Worthy” has the idea of living to match one’s position in Christ. We should generate other believers by our walk. It is a life filled with good works and Christ-centered. This is not a job chosen to make a living by, but to make a life by. Sufferings have been much more strongly spoken about in verses 11 and 12.We are part of the army of God, engaged in battle; we are part of the body of Christ; we are Christ's ambassadors representing God in this world. We are branches and Christ is the vine. We are the bride of Christ. As Christians we are trained not only to achieve a goal, but to become like Christ in the process of living in this world. We need to rejoice in the Lord always, not only when things are going well, even when the world is putting us down. So let us try to walk worthy to get the reward.

There was a small boy who was a rag picker. One day he found a wrist watch in the garbage. The boy understood that somebody would have lost it. So he took it and went house by house to find the owner of the watch to give it to the respective person. At last he found the owner of the watch who was a Muslim. The Muslim man asked the boy, what made him to bring the watch which costs around 4 lakhs. The boy replied I am Isawa. This means I belong to Jesus Christ. The boy also added that our scripture tells us to remain truthful and faithful in our words and deeds. By hearing the boy’s words the man’s heart was touched and was eager to know about Jesus. Finally he accepted Jesus and became the pastor of a church in Egypt. Like the boy in the story we are called to remain faithful and walk worthy to discern Christian public Witness. May God bless us through these words. Amen.

 

  

A. JOHN WESLEY

B.D. II

Something about Mary (Luke 1:26-38)

My tryst with UTC started in 1997 as a student and I have pleasant memories of my time here. I had never heard of UTC till the time I sent my application for BD. Everything was a new experience for me and every word a new learning. The moulding process was unique but effective and truly made me a different person all together. It also made sure that I would carry a tag all my life. I would be called “Made in UTC.”

I never knew what this meant until the point when I had students and a congregation of my own. The learning, teaching and pastoring experience in Kerala was always very fulfilling. But it was only at the end of my time in the regional seminary and in my former church that I knew that the tag “UTC” had a variety of meanings. It was at the same time confusing and appalling to be told by parish members and seminary students the same thing time and again. “We thought you would never pray and do ministry because you are from UTC. We are glad that we were proven wrong.” The elation of having been praised was also a pain of having been misunderstood with others stepping out of UTC. Whoever said UTC-ians don’t pray, have no ministerial interest and are not sincere. My church fortunately made an about turn with the notion on UTC and to a great extend now sees the college as a place which offers the freedom to think differently but pray fervently.

Ecumenism has not died dear friends. The accusation that we are praying to other Gods is all unsubstantiated humbug. Today’s worship is an effort to say that ecumenism still lives and we need it more than ever before. Misunderstanding of cultures, beliefs and systems are not inter religious problems but inter denominational, ecumenical problems. We need to sort out issues between ourselves inside the church before commenting on other aspects of religion and society.

So what is a Syrian orthodox priest doing in UTC? Can the CSI and CNI come to a common understanding with the Pentecostal, Orthodox, Catholic, Baptist and Presbyterian churches? Is there something more than Jesus that we can look up to for a common ground? This Sunday, these are some questions we can try and answer.

Luke 1:26-38 explains the announcement of angel Gabriel to Mary that she is going to give birth to Jesus. Mary is quite astounded and taken aback by the announcement but Gabriel reassures her. The enactment takes a different look at the passage and shows how Mary fears domestication as that which cannot fulfill what Gabriel announces to her. Mary’s status of a virgin is also her curse and she tries to make sense of what is happening.

Something about Mary is an effort to make sense of Gabriel’s announcement to Mary and how she responds to it. It is also an effort to see how Mother Mary offers a chance for unity between churches which can in turn keep the ecumenical flame burning.

Some of the traditional ways of looking at the passage is to point out the obedience of Mary, her virginity and thereby holiness and her special place in the church. While the churches belonging to the Orthodox and Catholic families have given St. Mary the status of ‘Theotokos’, the mother of God, others have questioned her virginity and her status as mother of God and also her status as someone who has to be venerated.

Our present struggles involve looking at other religions and our acceptance of them. My concern is to look within Christianity and identify common grounding through inspired reading of the bible. Why is it that when a seemingly popular preacher preaches it is marketed as the divine tongue and when a UTCian preaches it is blamed as ‘imaginative nonsense?’ Our readings are inspired and lead by the Holy Spirit and one should not doubt that.

The read passage offers us hope that there is something about Mary that could bring us together. It’s not just the procession or the chanting but the inspiration of Mary’s self that offers us life in its fullness.

1. Jo dhar ghaya samjo mar gaya- This is a dialogue in the iconic Hindi movie “Sholay” in which Amjad Khan playing Gabbar Singh delivers the eternally famous dialogue to his accomplices after shooting three of them. It just means that those who get scared or have fear in them will die then and there. Mary is scared of all that could happen by this visit of Gabriel. She is perplexed. One cannot blame her. She must have thought of the stories of spirits visiting people and what came about from these visits. She must have also thought of what was this character Gabriel hanging around for and trying to do by calling her the ‘favoured one’?

What was indeed going to happen? Was her freedom going to end? Would she be cornered into submission? The relationship between churches also borders around fear. Will I become less holy or pure if I mingle with other churches, will my people flock to other churches if I appear cozy with them, are others and their practises non-Christian and non-spiritual? Fear plays an important spoiler in ecumenical relations. Mary was also bordering around fear. The fear of losing familiar ground must have weighed heavily on her mind. Gabriel was telling things strange and unheard of. Would Mary be a victim to non-religious things? Mary being a Jew was doing something sacrilegious. She did what no other person would have the courage to do. She was becoming anti-religious from within the religion she stood in and anti-societal inside the society she was part of. She was scared but she overcame fear.

Mary’s reaction which was similar to “Jo dhar gaya, samjo mar gaya” not only defeats death for her but ensures life and salvation for all people as well. Mother Mary then becomes the symbolism of life by overcoming fear and death. She becomes the bearer of the son of God not by submission but by overcoming fear. This is a good model to follow for ecumenism as well. We don’t just submit to each other but we overcome the fear of one another and favour life through the birth of Christ in each of us.

  

2. Aathi kya Khandala? Virginity is not conformity.

Luke 1: 26-38 is misunderstood in several respects and Mother Mary is made out into a subservient, submissive, conformist by many. Elizabeth Johnson in her book “Truly Our Sister: A Theology of Mary in the Communion of Saints” makes the observation that several women writers have said that Mary has let down women by being a conformist and allowing Christian writers to make her the correct woman figure over and against Eve, because Mary reflects obedience over Eve’s disobedience. But this is far from the truth. Mary, as pointed out in the skit is not submissive but instead tries to prevent Gabriel from having his say. The biblical writer must have written it in a way to suggest that Mary is showcasing and questioning domestication and using virginity as an anti thesis to submission. It is not submission but questioning. It is not the oppression of women but the expression of women.

The 1998 Hindi movie “Ghulam” starring Aamir Khan and Rani Mukherjee was a runaway hit and had a very popular song “Aathi kya Khandala”. Khandala is a hill station and a place which is popular among the youth. The song has a young man telling the girl that they will go to Khandala and have fun.

Aey, Kya Bolti Tu

Aey, Kya Mein Bolun

Sun, Suna,

Aati Kya Khandala

Kya,Karoon, Aake Mein Khandala,

Arey Ghoomenge Phirenge Nachenge Gaaenge

Aish Karenge Aur Kya

Aey, Kya Bolti Tu

Aey, Kya Mein Bolun

But just because a girl goes there does not mean that she is morally worse than the boy who accompanied her. This pick up line “Aathi kya Khandala” was used and is still used by eve teasers and molestors on the road. An sms which went around much after the release of the movie was about a girl who had covered her face while entering the bus. An elderly man asks her “Aathi kya Khandala?” She replies “Papa, ye mein hoo” meaning father this is me your daughter.

Angel Gabriel is of course not asking Mary to go to Khandala with him. But Mary must have been petrified of having someone like him next to her, suggesting she is going to give birth to a child. Her reply that she is a virgin or that she is domesticated should be seen in two ways. One is to suggest that the angel should leave her alone and that she has nothing to do with men but is rather independent. Two is to suggest that how can a domesticated woman like her give birth to the son of the most high when she is domesticated by a patriarchal, male centric society? How can such good come out of her when she is part of the corrupt structure?

The church sees both in bits and pieces- Mary’s independence more than her virginity was at one point of time looked at as independence from the system. So the church identified with such independence. Many women leaning academics call Mary as a domesticated saint. This means that she has been accepted, elevated and used by a patriarchal church leadership and this essentially means that she is of no use to women. But on the other hand Mary is also questioning domestication and the skewed connotation of virginity. Mary refuses to get into the patriarchal “Aathi kya Khandala” enquiry and instead deals with the angel, writer and the church on her own terms. Joseph’s role even though small is very significant. He acts as the perfect decoy in the story, making people look at him and in the process Mary gets her space and freedom.

Non-Catholic and non- Orthodox churches need not write off Mother Mary as a domesticated saint. The church may have domesticated Mary to an extend but Mary has not allowed herself to be domesticated. Taking Mariology seriously can bring churches closer to tackle the problems posed by patriarchy and kierarchy, which is power centred. Having various church festivals in an ecumenical setting helps us to realize that we are not domesticated virgins but rather children of God, inspired by the life of saints like Mother Mary.

In my church the eight day lent from Sep 1-8 is commemorated to celebrate the nativity of St. Mary. But this is not an official church lent. Yet hundreds of thousands of people, especially women observe this lent and identify with Mother Mary and intercede to her. They talk, cry, spent time with and completely immerse themselves with Mother Mary. This is not church induced but people induced. Understanding such traditions and observances gives a much needed fillip and energy for sagging ecumenical relations between churches.

3. Mere Paas Maa hai- The MOM mission

 The assurance of angel Gabriel to Mary is that she will be filled with the Holy Spirit and bear a child who will be holy. It also suggests that the child bearer will be holy. In the 1975 Hindi movie Deewar, the character Vijay played by Amitabh Bachan tell his brother Ravi played by Shashi Kapoor, “Aaj mere paas paisa hai, bangla hai, gaadi hai, naukar hai, bank balance hai. Aur tumhare paas kya hai?” His brother replies “Mere paas Maa hai.” To the statement that one brother has money, a house, a car, a domestic help and a bank balance the other says that he has his mother with him!

The importance of a mother is well said and it reflects popular culture as well. The church believes that Mother Mary has the freedom and the proximity to intercede to her son Jesus. This is the special freedom of a mother. Ecumenical relations between churches are partly suffering because of an Americanised, homogenized, media style spirituality which leaves no space for the expression of local culture in our prayer and relationship with God. The neglect of the East and its spirituality is a cause of concern and a thorn in the flesh of ecumenical understanding between churches.

A New York Times cartoon reflects this refusal to accept India’s growth. The Mangalyan Mars Orbiter Mission (MOM) has been hailed as a success for a country like India. It has been cost effective and speedy and has used local elements in its research and design. Yet the cartoon shows a person with a cow knocking at the door of the Elite Space Club. It also reflects this coat and tie spirituality from the U.S. exported and marketed by a section of people there. This uni-directional, anti-culture spirituality which is against local culture and traditions pose a grave danger to Christian traditions in India and their relationship with each other.

The Mary Orbiter Mission can give us the opportunity to taste success in relationships between churches. This is a mutually respecting, learning and growing experience which has to be encouraged more in our context. To sum up, we must overcome fear, be non-conformists to wrong approaches and try to widen our belief system so that our prayers and spirituality become more effective. UTC becomes an apt space for us. It is a place to love, embrace and learn from each other. It is a vibrant ground of acceptance and respect. May God through the intercession of Mother Mary give us the opportunity to be good and better followers of Christ. Amen.

Jerry Kurian

Faculty, Department of Communication

Kuknalim: “…. the other Side of our Silence” (Rom 12:9-13.16-18)

Kuknalim denotes the aspiration and the struggle of the Naga people to live under one territorial homeland that is the greater lim (land). It also means victory and glory to our land. Kuknalim emerged in the usage of the early Naga nationalist movement when the people said goodbye before leaving the Naga in-habitat area to China and East Pakistan for training and for arms and ammunition to fight against the Indian army. As a remembrance for those who died in the jungles of Burma and on the way back from China and East Pakistan and whose grave still lies only in the unmarked grave in the jungles the word Kuknalim was coined to honour and to say to them that we have not yet forgotten your sacrifices.

Having experienced the aspiration of the Naga people to live under one territorial land and the struggle that we encounter to be accepted within the mainstream and spirit of the Pan-India-ness, I invite you to voyage towards a relationship of love, honour and acceptance without hypocrisy. The text Romans 12:9-13 and 16-18 calls for accepting one another based on the love of a neighbour and love as a norm for social relationship.

Let Love be without Hypocrisy

The word agape in this text transcends beyond the accepted notion of the Divine love of God towards the new understanding of establishing human relationship and love. Paul’s message to the Romans posited the call for extending the love of family to the members of the society. The organic imagery of the inter-relatedness of the body requires to be supplemented by the emotional bond of family affection, the feelings of deep affection for another and others. Showing respect to one another in love underlines the sense of honour and respect not in terms of status and intrinsic quality but in terms of membership of the same body.

Paul’s message for love without hypocrisy reinforces the notion that love should provide structure for the Christians to relate with fellow human beings in the community on the path to build trust in the day today life and endeavour a lifestyle of accepting human relationship in each other’s lives. The absolute primacy of genuine love is that love must not be disguised for ulterior motives rather true love should be free from all pretense and hypocrisy. To love genuinely is to accept and regard others with honour. Anything that is not love and resembles evil is the enemy in the human relationship as it prevents the establishment of genuine relationship and hampers individuals to accept fellow human beings. To honour the other fellow person is one way of holding in check the innate human tendency to honour oneself unduly. Affectionate relationship would outdo one another in showing honour to each other.

Guts to Be In Comradeship

In the passage, Paul called out the Romans to live in agreement and harmony, in accordance with acceptance and honour. The attempt to live in a whole-hearted relationship is a lifestyle rather than a grudging or calculating act. The caution of not being wise in one’s own self-estimate prevents the possibility of a corporate act of superiority complex over other person’s culture and identity. The courage to live in a comradeship relationship calls for the need to be sensitive to the view and ways of life of the other people.

The task of the individuals as the community of human race is to embody love and grace to the other people, where the treatment and care for the other and enemies is intended to turn them from enmity to friendship. This calls for an endeavour to live in a society with different values and goals without any corruption of thoughts and action. If there arises corruption and evil in the society it does not mean that everything within it -its values and actions- are totally evil and without good. Rather the problem lies with the people’s inability to discern the ideals of grace, love and evil. Pride sows the seed of discord. The tendency to regard oneself as worthy of preferential treatment is universal in scope. The entire range of personal conflict, which reaches all the way from the minor squabbles to international wars, is based on the misguided notion that we are better than they are or that they have done something against our interest.

The effort to arrive at mutual understanding of living in harmony admits oneself to a humble situation of life not aspiring to be imminent but open towards humble situations. Humility detests the ambition to be autocrats and a high superiority complex rather it calls for an association with the humble and nameless section of people in the society. The natural impulse is to return injury for an injury. Paul’s message for the Romans was that for those who declare acceptance to the grace and love of God it becomes imperative for them to repay good for evil and right what is wrong. Instead of allowing evil to get the better of the situation, it was imperative to hold onto something that is good and humble, as friendship becomes a better antidote for hatred and enmity.

“… the other Side of our Silence”

There arises no notion of love lost between the ‘India’ and the Naga people even though it has been almost 67 years that no solution has been concluded even though Nagaland was added to the statehood of Indian Union on 1^st December 1961. By the year 1929, the Nagas through a memorandum to the Simeon Commission expressed their desire of continual path of self-determination to the British Crown as separate identity and nation state, distinct from India. As such, the Naga National Council declared independence on 14^th August 1947 and this was reaffirmed again by the Naga national voluntary Plebiscite in May 1951, where 99.9% of Naga people voted to remain a sovereign independent country as in ancient time. Rejection by the Naga national leaders to accept and assimilate into the free independent India was considered as revolt and dissent by the newly formed Indian union. Military intervention was sanctioned to ‘neutralise’ the Nagas’ aspiration for self-determination. Violence and bloodshed emerged from the Indo-Naga imbroglio as armed conflict was considered the resort by both the sides to achieve its ends. Casualties were inflicted on both sides where hundreds and thousands of lives were lost and shattered.

Today Nagas and people from the North Eastern region are often ascribed as part of Chinese people or other Mongolian nations in South East Asia. An ascription that clearly declares ‘you are not an Indian and you are not welcome here’. The very existence of the AFSPA (passed in the Indian Parliament to be implemented in Naga Hills) in the Naga inhabit at areas (parts of the North Eastern States and Kashmir) betrays the very notion of the fundamental right to life and freedom that is sanctioned in the Indian constitution. The government at Delhi follows the path of planting discord within the Naga families and tribes as a strategic tool and weapon to sever the spirit and aspiration of the Nagas to live under one territorial homeland.

The government at Delhi quotes the presence of infighting among the Nagas as hurdle for bringing out a solution to the Indo-Naga imbroglio. However, without negating the presence of schism within the Naga family the question that is being raised today is can the government at Delhi have the sincerity to solve the issue of the Indo-Naga imbroglio. For instance the stand of Nehru, the then Prime Minister of India, to the President of NNC A. Z. Phizo on 11^th March 1952 “that whether heaven falls, or India goes to pieces and blood runs red all over the country” there would be no discussion on the Naga issue does not help the cause for a dialogue of sorting things for a solution. Rather the declaration of Atal Bihari Vajpayee, the then prime minister of India, in 1997 that “Naga history is unique” and in whose government the ceasefire agreement was signed with the Naga nationalist forces, that cease the firing till dawn, could provide impetus for finding an honourable and acceptable solution.

Paul’s message to the Romans was to let love exist without hypocrisy so that one could achieve esteem from the concord of the community as a warning against false esteem. When love and acceptance is sincere, genuine relationship would be established without any hypocrisy, biased feelings, and attitude. The epitaph on the World War II cemetery in Kohima, Nagaland reads “when you go home tell them of us and say that for your tomorrow we gave our today”. However, today I affirm to tell the message of the words that are found on the epitaph of a woman, a victim of the AFSPA, that reads, “go and tell the world what you have heard from the other side of silence”. Somewhere down the line in various parts of India and the world, you might come across the issue of conflict and violence happening in the valleys and hills of Nagalim, at such time re-member us to tell the world of our struggles and the aspiration to live as Nagas. Not a blind supporter to our struggles of everyday life that we encounter under the peril of an automatic rifle but as citizens of the free world, fellow human beings and for the love of freedom tell for us to the world that freedom is not free until everyone is endowed with the right to life and liberty to reside freely.

The Naga call for acceptance into the ‘mainstream’ Indian union maintains the stand that acceptance should be based on genuine respect and honour to an extent that there exists no place for hierarchy and no place of one being the source of provision for the other. Nagas want to be accepted just the way we are and who we are: nothing more and nothing less than a mere member of the human community. Acceptance to the mainstream Indian union should not be based on the notion that it is the Nagas who benefit from such conglomeration. Rather it should be based on the stand that accepting each other is beneficial for both the Indian union and for the Nagas as they could gain more in harmony rather than being antagonistic to each other.

            KUKNALIM!

 

CHENIJAN PATTON 
BD IV